Sunday, April 22, 2012

Week 8 - Reflection


Distance learning perceptions are varied and change over time. In the next five, ten and even twenty years distance learning will surely change and evolve. Along with this will be a change and evolution in the perceptions of distance learning, mostly as compared to traditional learning.
As Instructional Designers it is our responsibility to create effective, meaningful and precise instruction that achieves the single most important goal of educating learners. The delivered education must however be thorough so that all learning outcomes are truly achieved. O'Malley & Harrison (1999) stated that student perceptions of the effectiveness of distance and on-line learning may be more important than reality. This perceived learning will contribute to distance learning professional's knowledge of distance learning instruction effectiveness (O'Malley & Harrison, 1999).
Our additional responsibility as Instructional Designers is to constantly evolve. Siemens (n.d.) states that society as a whole is more widely accepting distance education largely due to more and more of us communicating online. Those that thought face to face education was superior to distance education are now having personal and meaningful relationships online. This sets them up to easily see how those relationships can be built in an education setting. Siemens (n.d.) adds that society has begun to recognize that distance and geographic separation is not as significant a factor as it has been thought to be. This is based on the proliferation of new tools and technology such as video teleconferences, instant messages, e-mail, online Learning Management Systems (LMS), etc. Siemens (n.d.) goes on to state that society is growing more comfortable with these tools and accepting them in much greater numbers. Learners have also discovered that as they get to get together in learning groups with likeminded people using these new tools they are often doing so with a globally diverse group (Siemens, n.d.).
With these growing acceptances, one may wonder where distance education is heading as a whole. Siemens (n.d.) suggests that we will inevitably see improved technologies that deliver better and better voice and video quality and experts from around the world in these fields will become contributors to the new distance learning .There will also be an increase in the use of multimedia such as games and simulations (Siemens, n.d.). Mayer's Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning (2001) fits right into this scenarios and distance learning is the perfect place to apply Mayer’s theory (Mayer, 2001).
As Instructional Designers we can do many things to improve societal perceptions of distance learning. We can start by embracing these new tools. As we produce more and more advanced designs, we should also be sure to apply valid learning theories, such as Mayer’s cognitive multimedia theory, as the basis for them. Additionally, Siemens (n.d.) states that the key challenge is to bridge the gap of comfort within learners so that they become comfortable learning at a distance. Siemens adds that of the students that he has questioned who have taken at least two online courses the majority of them tend to prefer distance learning to traditional learning (Siemens, n.d.). For Instructional Designers to be a positive force for continuous improvement in the field of distance education we must learn from the learners and use our designs to help significantly drive the future of distance education. We do this by creating instruction that not only meets the requirements I mentioned early on in this post, but by also making them attractive, interesting, contain the latest tools, and most of all “cool” (but not at the expense of quality).
In closing I feel that the future of distance learning is the future of all learning. Siemens (n.d.) described the future of Distance Learning as the triple helix model where universities, government and businesses form an interconnected strand of that conspires to equip students for online environment (Siemens, n.d.). I think that is a wise prediction but I also feel that distance learning will one day overtake traditional learning in its percentage share of the learning environment. While it may never completely replace traditional learning, traditional learning will never be without some aspect of distance learning ever again .I foresee all future education containing some component, such as a video conference, an Internet delivered video or collaboration, and any number for computer networked content delivery. As society becomes more and more “connected” and geographic boundaries disappear, learners limiting themselves to just local universities will become a thing of the past. The world is now the stage for education, not just your local state or community college.

References

Kearsly, G.(n.d.) Tips for training online instructors. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/OItips.htm

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

O'Malley, J., McCraw, H., (1999). Students perceptions of distance learning, online learning and the traditional classroom. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, II(IV), Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/omalley24.html

Siemens, G. (n.d.). The Future of Distance Education. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/Walden/EDUC/6135/08/downloads/WAL_EDUC6135_08_A_EN-CC.zip

Sunday, April 1, 2012

Week 5 - The Impact of Open Source

While Open Source courseware, such as Moodle, is popular these days, another phenomenon referred to as Open Courses seem to be catching on as well. The differences between the two are vast and the only thing they really have in common is the word “open” in their name.

Open Source courseware is a Learning Management System (LMS) whose source code is openly available for download and modification by everyone. That means the actual software can be customized to work with various institutions and users. The courses prepared in the Open Source LMSs are mostly independent of the code used to present them. Open Courses however are instruction that is created and presented to the public for free, using any variety of LMSs and is not tied to any LMS. These Open Courses, though free, are usually copyrighted and have specific terms of use that do not allow them to be altered.

This week I selected an Open Course from Yale entitled PHYS 200: Fundamentals of Physics I (©Yale University, 2012) to evaluate. It is taught by Professor Ramamurti Shankarm, the John Randolph Huffman Professor of Physics at Yale.

I gravitated towards this course for three reasons. First is the fact that it is from Yale, of all places. Secondly, I have seen the same course on iTunesU ® and have had some time to study its content and its delivery. Last, but certainly not least, I have a keen interest in Physics, though I completely lack the math skills to do the coursework.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

·        Does the course appear to be carefully pre-planned and designed for a distance learning environment? How so?

 

Below is a screen shot from the actual course homepage.




   © Yale University 2012.


As you can see the layout of this open course was very clean. From the beginning you can see that the Web page is not flashy and does not have a lot of distractions going on in the background. Simonson et al. (2012) point out that when creating online instruction the actual online time for delivery is often limited and inflexible. Therefore weeding out extraneous and nonessential information to make room for the essential content is a must (Simonson et al., 2012).

 

Pre-planning for distance learning was done very carefully here. The links from the home page are few but carry a lot of weight. There are links for the syllabus, the recorded video classroom sessions, information on joining a study group, and the Yale bookstore to buy books for the course. One of the best features is that you can download all of the course Web pages (10MB ZIP file) which allows you to view the entire course offline and includes all of the course materials. The course materials also include full transcripts to help with the note taking! Lastly, the video and audio content are also available from YouTube and iTunesU. Once caveat, be sure to read the Terms of Use for all of the Open Yale courses (UYC). The interesting part of those terms to me was the age restriction, where use of OYCs are restricted to those individuals over 18 years of age, emancipated minors, or those who possess legal parental or guardian consent.

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

·        Does the course follow the recommendations for online instruction as listed in the course textbook Teaching and Learning at a Distance from Simonson et al. (2012)?

While it would seem that Yale had committed the ultimate sin of dumping a face to face design onto the Web and presented it as an online instruction, a method Simonson et al. (2012) referred to as “shovelware”, that is not the case (Simonson et al., 2012). While is it true that the course consist largely of videos recordings of the professor lecturing his students, it does still contain activities that are specific to the online environment (Simonson et al., 2012). Yet Yale sort of gets a pass on this requirement since the course is not actually and active course led by a real live instructor who will hold you to commitments and actually grade your course work. For example, the syllabus states that homework is assigned on Wednesday and is due the following Wednesday before class. The problem is that there is no one to turn the homework into, there is no one to grade it for you and there really is not a class to attend synchronously or asynchronously.

 

Below is the YouTube verision of the first class session.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

·        Did the course designer implement course activities that maximize active learning for the students?

Piskurich (n.d.) states that a good online design based on ADDIE will result in a very complete Syllabus that tells the students exactly what they will learn, how they will learn it, and what is expected of them Piskurich (n.d.). While the course is adapted from a face to face class that was videotaped and it followed the design of that class in the form of course work assignments, the work is highly applicable in the online environment. However, were this to be  a real class that one could actively participate in, there would be a few things that would need to be changed.

First of all, interactive sessions could take place synchronously between students and the Professor at least once a week to help explain key concepts and hold a question and answer session. The remainder of the course could be asynchronous in the form of interactive Web pages that allow for the student to try various solutions to problem in a multiple choice type quiz. However, given the nature of this Open Course it does deliver a slam dunk on content and is very educational. Unfortunately, like all Open Courses, there is not any earned college credits available. If you have the time or need to learn and do not need credits this may be the course for you. I would personally shy away from Open Courses unless I just had nothing better to do with my time. Personally, I like being able to have some ting to show for my efforts.

The Yale Open Course entitled PHYS 200: Fundamentals of Physics I mentioned in this blog is available: http://oyc.yale.edu/physics/phys-200

The course videos can also be viewed on YouTube® at: http://www.youtube.com/yalecourses#g/c/FE3074A4CB751B2B

 

References

 

Piskurich, G. (n.d.). Planning and Designing Online Courses. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/Walden/EDUC/6135/05/downloads/WAL_EDUC6135_05_A_EN-CC.zip

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th ed.) Boston, MA: Pearson.